ZachIsHere

Went out and did some shooting with friends from work. It turned out to be a lot of fun. Kristen did a really good job and Kelly came along to help us out. This process can be a blast when people relax and let go a bit. I got them together for a snapshot at the end. One interesting thing about Kristen. I can say with supreme confidence that I will never again be paid with a check that has a “My Little Pony” design on it. Hilarious, I can just imagine the look I am going to get from the teller at Commerce Bank.

The more success these paying gigs have the more it seems momentum is building with my photography and the goals I have set for it. Really exciting time.

Bad Harold and Kumar movie reference aside there has been a big uproar over Flickr’s decision to include video into their previously photo only service. I read through some of the groups and messages of this “revolt” and nothing more than some eye rolling was produced. There is a lot being made about how the addition of video will add so much noise and kill the fine art photographers that have made Flickr such an important part of their work. The online version of “video killed the radio star” if you will. A few points.

First off, I love Flickr and its community. I have been a Flickr user for more than 4 years through 3k+ photos and 20k photo stream views. It has been instrumental in evolving my knowledge and appreciation for photography.

The Myspace-ification of Flickr has done more to kill fine art photography on the site than video will ever be able to do. People begging for comments on photos, making contests and little .gif awards and throwing them at every mediocre photo they can click just hoping their photos or group get attention. Video has nothing on ratings requests, judging, scores, and interestingness obsession that fill groups and pollute comment streams.

Not everyone uses Flickr the same way, respect that. Flickr is what you make of it. For some people it is a vehicle to showcase and discuss new photography techniques, amazing photos, and technical know how. For some people? It is a great place to put that picture of their dog with that ridiculous hat online and the video that goes with it. Their usage of Flickr is as valid as the previous group. Me personally? Flickr is that messy room that has everything in it when I need it. There are photos and sets and collections tossed all over the place, titled and in an order that only I can make sense of. It is always there for me to grab for use in better, more organized ways like on this site or for use in ZCPhotography.com. I don’t link people to my actual Flickr page anymore, it is too generic. Some people’s Flickr page is literally the face of their photography business online. If that works for them fantastic. getting worked up because people don’t use the service the way you do seems silly. Everything you have done with Flickr? You can still do.

Groups of people on the internet absolutely love being offended. This isn’t just pinned on the Flickr community it is an internet wide thing. People get worked up when Flickr changes the interestingness algorithm. There will be protest explore photos and drama spilling into the forums but I hope Flickr keeps the video because it seems pretty handy.

Maybe some of the top users can just relax and work on their lame 365 project.

This is a question I have been getting a lot lately. People who are just getting into photography or people who take a lot of pictures with their friends and wonder why they are different.

It occurs to me that people are too focused on the technology. When I am out with friends and they give me their point and shoot for a picture outside of a bar as soon as it is in my hands they make jokes about how terrible it is and basically apologize that they have a consumer camera like I am above this little toy and should be thanked for gracing the shutter button with my pointer finger. You know what? I miss having a point and shoot. I miss that little Canon S2IS. When I get my hands on one I generally go to town getting all these fun little angles that are tough for my 5D. It is also fun to have the freedom to shoot without being noticed so much. Don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t trade my rig for anything but the point is the magic is in composition.

You need to work to eliminate artifice. What is artifice? I have to admit I got it from Tom Hanks. He was being interviewed on “Inside The Actors Studio” by James Lipton and his cue cards. He talked about his pursuit to keep artifice out of all the work he does. That feeling that something isn’t genuine. There are times when you are lost in a movie and completely into it. It is the difference between watching Tom Hanks in a movie and getting into it as opposed to watching a movie and feeling like you are watching a person who is an actor reading lines. This same thing can be applied to photos. It is about creating scenes that are void of small things that take away from the feeling a photo is trying to convey. Some examples below.

This is a photo from the archives that hasn’t been messed with or processed. Not a terrible shot but the focus of this was supposed to be the building. That car pretty much messes everything up. It takes away so much of the attention. Then there are also some small pieces of litter and the tree doesn’t add anything to the photo. The second photo is another story. It hasn’t been processed either but it has total focus on the building. The car and other things taking away attention are all out. The sky acts as something that makes the building look even better. It almost looks like something that isn’t real. When it comes to composition what you put in the frame is as important as what you don’t put in the frame.

Below is a photo of downtown Kansas City I did a few months back. It captures an urban scene better than most the stuff I have done. Nothing there takes away from the overall feeling a viewer takes away from the photo. If there was a big Payday Loans advertisement on the side of the building it would change everything. Instead of this view of an urban landscape it would be the same old street you pass everyday.

Understand the things in your photo and their relationship with each other. This is something I would like to work on more as time goes on. Really understanding what is in a photo and what feelings these elements conjure in a viewer is important. I have never seen a better example of this than Matt Stuart’s work. Matt’s ability to take different unrelated objects in photos and snap them in a way that adds narrative is a huge inspiration. Focusing on all the things in your image and exploring their relationships is one of the best parts of photography.

There are so many variables with photography. Intent, audience, and context to name a few. There are no absolutes pr rules that make the “perfect” picture. Focusing hard on what is and isn’t in your picture and taking away anything that detracts from that will produce improved photos coming out of your camera.

He always looks so happy and excited around the house but he seems to be so sad in most of the photographs taken of him.

I stumbled into photography accidentally. Took a class that provided me with a cheapo digital camera and let me run free with it. I must have canvassed the whole town; nothing was safe from that lens. Walking down the streets in a very deliberate fashion looking for the angle, the reflection, the interesting person, or the narrative jump out at me. Standing in the middle of a sidewalk just gazing into an empty alley trying to ignore the people around me that were justifiably confused as to what was going on or what I was doing. I remember being out in the middle of the night taking pictures in downtown Springfield. Nobody was around…even the bar crowd had cleared out. The whole place is usually so lively but it was empty right now and the feeling was eerie. Moving into the middle of the street and getting close to the road I took a few shots.

I remember being floored by this photo. Being absolutely in love with it. These days? I might not give this a second look. The whole thing is too yellow for my liking and the closeup road thing is cool but you see too much asphalt…being able to see more beyond the road is more interesting.

But who is right? The person now or then? I am not sure. These days I am blessed with a really nice rig. A camera setup that lets me do everything I could dream of but there are times I feel like I was a better shooter with that $75 camera. You had to work harder for it. The technical limitations of the camera forced you to go about things in creative ways to get shots.

I wouldn’t trade what I have now of course. I am able to do a lot of interesting work in almost any setting. But sometimes I wonder if the L series lens and the fast shutter speed have made my eye for the “real” shot lazy.